- ideas n details
- debate whether dr Zinc should come to debate
My motion for the following report is for the request that dr Zinc won't attend nor speak at one of the group's debate meetings. Our school cannot afford to entertain feeble actors, and I will state my following factors as towards the current situation of dr Zinc impending presence.
Dr Zinc is known to have alluring and persuasive techniques to attarct large crowds, but I do not see the reason for a prestigious school such as ours to fall for an act. Dr Zinc does not overall argue, just forms a theater, an act. His words are one that scripted, and would not be suitable for a heated and on going debate. Although people fall for the facade, I believe we should progress past that and look into the perspective of how dr Zinc does not actually persuade through concrete arguments, but through pityful lies. His presence is not appropiate because he is not a debater, he is an actor - and acting will not elevate him to succed through facts and arguments to win, and therefore would not be a adequate figure to speak.
Debating is about figures and statistics, and dr Zinc is about show and illusion of minds. Shedding tears and adapting your voice to lure your audience in is not what we should be learning in the subject. If I wished to have joined a drama school, then Dr Zinc would be more then well-equipped. I have heards of his tall tales about Earth's destruction, and how he conveyed the crowd to cling to his every word. Although his speeches are admirable and could be of help, his lies and theaterics wouldn't be compactable with the real world and the discussions at our meetings.
His act is convincing, but if we wish to be swayed by rehearsed words so easily, we might as well invite any person into our meetings. Therefore, I believe Dr Zinc should not, under any circumstance, come to our debate meetings.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment