Critically Acclaimed

I'm between usually and always being entertained when I go to a movie, but afterwards I always have a reproach and word to suggest...so here goes nuffin`...

Thor: I can praise the amazing effects that pull you in the world of Thor, and the action sequences that are hero-worthy. As a bystanding movie, it was less then average, but - in the angle of it being  a superhero origin movie, I was pleasantly suprised. I'm usually reluctant to go to origin movies because they seem to be the hardest to make and the rarest to get right. Plot is either to far-streched or relationships are too stable and are hard for the viewers to comprehend. Even if Thor managed to support it's background story, it majorely lacked plot and was relying on the action sequences, that although were in-depth because of, I assume, the 3D, were a well-timed distraction from what I assume was either the lack of chemistry between Thor and Jane or lack of caring in the writer. All relationships seemed confusing and blurry, and the one liners of natalie portman bothered me. Anthony Hopkin's character was well portrayed, yet not well-explained. There didn't seem to be enough time for the plot to reach climax, as there wasn't much to begin with.
As far as superhero movies go, Thor isn't the best but isn't the worst. The eye-candy that was associated with Thor was a pleasant 3D gift-wrapped surprise.